ABOUT

SU.RE - Sustainable Resolution is the Indian Apparel Industry’s largest voluntary commitment to sustainability is an initiative by the Clothing Manufacturing Association of India (CMAI), Reliance Brands Limited (RBL), UN in India, and The Ministry of Textiles India aiming to catalyse the industry’s transition towards sustainability.

Read More

MANIFESTO

OUR PARTNERS

SIGNATORY BRANDS

STEERING COMMITTEE

EVENTS

SUSTAINABILITY 101

In recent years, the fashion industry has faced increasing scrutiny for its significant environmental impact. As sustainability becomes a crucial focus, brands and consumers alike are seeking ways to mitigate the adverse effects of clothing production and consumption. One powerful tool in this endeavor is the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), a systematic method to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with all stages of a product's life. This article delves into the nuances of LCA in fashion, exploring its stages, benefits, and the transformative potential it holds for the industry.
 
Understanding Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
 
A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is defined as the systematic analysis of the potential environmental impacts of products or services during the entire life cycle. Depending on the scope of assessment—cradle to gate, cradle to grave, or cradle to cradle—it can include an analysis of different stages such as design, production, usage, disposal, and recycling of materials.
 
  • Cradle to Gate: This assessment covers the environmental impacts from the extraction of raw materials (cradle) to the point where the product leaves the manufacturer (gate).
  • Cradle to Grave: This approach extends the assessment to the entire lifespan of the product, from raw material extraction to disposal.
  • Cradle to Cradle: This model goes a step further, focusing on the potential for products to be reused or recycled into new products, promoting a circular economy.
Stages of LCA in Fashion
 
  1. Design and Raw Material Extraction: The LCA begins with the design phase, where decisions about materials, production processes, and product lifespan are made. The choice of raw materials significantly impacts the overall environmental footprint. Natural fibers like cotton, for example, require vast amounts of water and pesticides, whereas synthetic fibers like polyester rely heavily on fossil fuels. Innovations in sustainable materials, such as organic cotton, recycled polyester, and bio-based fibers, aim to reduce these impacts.
  2. Production: The production stage encompasses all processes involved in transforming raw materials into finished products. This includes spinning, weaving, dyeing, and assembly. Each step consumes energy, water, and chemicals, contributing to pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainable practices in production, such as using renewable energy sources, adopting water-saving dyeing techniques, and minimizing chemical use, are critical in reducing the environmental burden.
  3. Distribution and Retail: The transportation of fashion products from factories to retailers and ultimately to consumers constitutes another significant stage. This phase considers the energy and emissions associated with logistics and distribution. Strategies like local sourcing, optimizing transport routes, and adopting low-emission vehicles can mitigate environmental impacts.
  4. Usage: The usage phase of clothing includes activities like washing, drying, ironing, and dry cleaning, which collectively account for a considerable portion of the environmental impact. Encouraging consumers to adopt sustainable practices, such as washing clothes at lower temperatures, line drying, and reducing ironing, can significantly lower energy and water consumption. Additionally, designing durable garments that withstand frequent use and promoting second-hand markets can extend the product's lifecycle.
  5. End-of-Life: The final stage of LCA addresses the disposal and potential recycling of garments. Conventional disposal methods, such as landfilling and incineration, pose severe environmental threats. However, initiatives like textile recycling, upcycling, and composting aim to divert waste from landfills and recover valuable materials. Brands are increasingly adopting take-back schemes and designing for disassembly, facilitating easier recycling at the product's end-of-life.
 
Benefits of LCA in Fashion
 
  • Informed Decision-Making: LCA provides a comprehensive understanding of the environmental impacts at each stage of a product's life. This knowledge enables designers, manufacturers, and policymakers to make informed decisions that prioritize sustainability.
  • Transparency and Accountability: By quantifying environmental impacts, LCA promotes transparency and holds companies accountable for their ecological footprint. Consumers can make more informed choices based on the sustainability credentials of their purchases.
  • Identifying Improvement Areas: LCA identifies critical areas where environmental impacts are most significant, guiding targeted interventions. For instance, if dyeing processes are found to be highly polluting, companies can invest in cleaner technologies or alternative methods.
  • Regulatory Compliance and Standards: As governments and organizations increasingly mandate sustainability reporting, LCA helps fashion brands comply with regulations and meet industry standards. This proactive approach can also enhance brand reputation and competitiveness.
  • Promoting Circular Economy: Cradle to cradle assessments highlight opportunities for designing products that can be reused, recycled, or composted, fostering a circular economy. THis shift reduces waste and conserves resources, aligning with global sustainability goals.
 
While LCA offers substantial benefits, it also faces challenges. The complexity and variability of fashion supply chains can make data collection and analysis difficult. Ensuring accurate and comprehensive data from all stages of a product's life requires collaboration across the industry. Moreover, standardizing LCA methodologies and metrics is essential for consistency and comparability.
 
Advancements in technology and data analytics are poised to enhance LCA practices. Digital tools can streamline data collection, automate analysis, and provide real-time insights. Additionally, integrating social and economic impacts into LCA, alongside environmental factors, can offer a more holistic view of sustainability.
 
Life Cycle Assessment is a powerful tool that can drive the fashion industry towards greater sustainability. By evaluating the environmental impacts at each stage of a product's life, LCA helps identify areas for improvement, promotes transparency, and supports informed decision-making. As the industry continues to innovate and adopt sustainable practices, LCA will play a crucial role in shaping a more responsible and eco-friendly fashion future. Embracing LCA is not just an option but a necessity for an industry striving to balance style with sustainability.
 

The fashion industry, renowned for its fast-paced trends and mass production, has long been criticized for its significant environmental footprint. However, a paradigm shift is underway as the industry increasingly embraces the principles of a circular economy. A Circular Economy favors activities that preserve value in the form of energy, labor, and materials. This means designing for durability, reuse, remanufacturing, and recycling to keep products, components, and materials circulating in the economy. Driven by design, the circular economy aims to eliminate waste and pollution, circulate products and materials at their highest value, and regenerate nature. Transitioning to a circular economy is essential for reducing fashion's environmental impact, and this article explores how the industry is adopting these principles to create a more sustainable future.
 
The Principles of a Circular Economy
 
The circular economy is based on three fundamental principles:
  • Eliminate Waste and Pollution: Traditional linear economies operate on a take-make-dispose model, leading to significant waste and environmental pollution. In contrast, the circular economy prioritizes designing out waste from the beginning. By rethinking and redesigning products and processes, waste and pollution can be minimized, and the use of harmful substances can be avoided.
  • Circulate Products and Materials at Their Highest Value: The circular economy emphasizes keeping products, components, and materials in use for as long as possible. This involves designing products for durability, repairability, and recyclability, enabling them to be reused, refurbished, remanufactured, or recycled. By maintaining the highest value of materials and products, the circular economy reduces the need for virgin resources and minimizes waste.
  • Regenerate Nature: A circular economy seeks to regenerate natural systems rather than deplete them. This principle involves using renewable resources, enhancing biodiversity, and restoring ecosystems. By aligning economic activities with the regenerative capacity of nature, the circular economy promotes long-term sustainability and resilience.
 
Transitioning to a Circular Economy in Fashion
 
The fashion industry is beginning to adopt these principles through various initiatives and strategies that prioritize sustainability and resource conservation.
 
  1. Designing for Durability, Repairability, and Recyclability: One of the core tenets of the circular economy is designing products that last longer and can be easily repaired or recycled. Brands are increasingly focusing on creating durable garments that withstand wear and tear. For example, Patagonia, known for its commitment to sustainability, designs clothing with robust materials and offers repair services to extend the life of its products. Similarly, Eileen Fisher's "Renew" program takes back old garments, refurbishes them, and resells them, promoting a circular approach.
  2. Collecting, Refurbishing, and Upcycling Used Garments: Extending the life of clothing through collection, refurbishment, and upcycling is another critical aspect of the circular economy. Many brands and organizations are implementing take-back schemes and donation programs to collect used garments. For instance, H&M's Garment Collecting initiative encourages customers to bring in unwanted clothes, which are then sorted for resale, recycling, or upcycling. Upcycling, which involves creatively transforming old garments into new products, is gaining popularity among designers and consumers alike. This approach not only reduces waste but also adds unique value to discarded items.
  3. Recycling Programs and Initiatives: Recycling plays a pivotal role in reducing textile waste and the burden on landfills. Advanced recycling technologies are emerging to process various types of textiles and fibers. Chemical recycling, for example, breaks down synthetic fibers like polyester into their basic components, allowing them to be reconstituted into new fibers. Mechanical recycling, on the other hand, involves shredding textiles into fibers that can be spun into new yarn. Brands like Adidas are pioneering innovative recycling initiatives, such as their collaboration with Parley for the Oceans to create shoes from recycled ocean plastic. Additionally, companies like The North Face and Levi's are incorporating recycled materials into their product lines, showcasing the potential of recycling in the fashion industry.
  4. Circular Models for Resource Conservation and Reduced Consumption: Circular business models are emerging as viable alternatives to traditional consumption patterns. These models focus on resource conservation and reducing the overall demand for new products. For example, rental services like Rent the Runway and subscription-based fashion services allow consumers to access a wide range of clothing without the need for ownership. This approach not only reduces the demand for new garments but also promotes the reuse of existing ones. Furthermore, some brands are exploring product-as-a-service models, where customers pay for the use of a product rather than owning it. This shift encourages brands to design high-quality, durable products that can be maintained and reused over time.
 
The Benefits of Circular Economy Initiatives
 
The adoption of circular economy principles and recycling initiatives offers numerous benefits for the fashion industry and the environment.
 
  • Resource Efficiency: By keeping materials in use for longer and reducing the reliance on virgin resources, the circular economy promotes resource efficiency and conserves natural resources.
  • Waste Reduction: Circular initiatives help minimize waste generation and divert textiles from landfills, reducing the environmental burden of disposal.
  • Lower Carbon Footprint: Extending the life of products and incorporating recycled materials can significantly reduce the carbon footprint associated with fashion production and consumption.
  • Economic Opportunities: The circular economy creates new business opportunities, from repair and refurbishment services to innovative recycling technologies and circular business models.
  • Consumer Engagement: Brands that embrace circular practices can engage environmentally conscious consumers and build loyalty through transparent and sustainable practices.
 
While the transition to a circular economy in fashion is promising, it also faces challenges. The complexity of fashion supply chains, the diversity of materials, and the need for standardized recycling processes pose significant hurdles. Additionally, changing consumer behavior and fostering a cultural shift towards sustainable consumption require concerted efforts from all stakeholders.
 
Collaboration across the industry is essential to overcome these challenges. Brands, manufacturers, policymakers, and consumers must work together to create a supportive ecosystem for circular practices. Investing in research and development, fostering innovation in recycling technologies, and promoting education and awareness about circular economy principles are crucial steps toward a more sustainable future.
 
The fashion industry's embrace of circular economy principles and recycling initiatives marks a significant shift towards sustainability. By designing for durability, reuse, and recyclability, collecting and upcycling used garments, implementing recycling programs, and adopting circular business models, the industry can reduce its environmental impact and contribute to a more sustainable future. While challenges remain, the potential benefits of a circular economy are immense, offering a pathway to resource conservation, waste reduction, and long-term resilience. As the fashion industry continues to evolve, embracing circular practices is not just an option but a necessity for a sustainable and thriving future.
 

In recent years, the fashion industry has come under increasing pressure to address its environmental, social, and governance (ESG) responsibilities. ESG is a risk assessment framework that helps internal and external stakeholders understand how an organization is managing risks and opportunities related to these criteria. It ensures that an organization takes a holistic view, addressing not only environmental issues but also social and governance aspects. This article explores the importance of ESG in the fashion industry, its key components, and how leading brands are integrating ESG principles into their operations.
 
Understanding ESG: Key Components
 
  1. Environmental Criteria: Environmental criteria consider how a company performs as a steward of nature. In the context of the fashion industry, this includes how brands manage their environmental footprint through sustainable sourcing of materials, energy efficiency, waste management, water usage, and greenhouse gas emissions. Companies are expected to minimize their negative impact on the environment and implement practices that promote sustainability and resource conservation.
  2. Social Criteria: Social criteria examine how a company manages relationships with employees, suppliers, customers, and the communities where it operates. This includes labor practices, health and safety, diversity and inclusion, community engagement, and human rights. For the fashion industry, social criteria are critical due to the extensive global supply chains that often involve workers in developing countries. Ensuring fair wages, safe working conditions, and respect for workers' rights are paramount.
  3. Governance Criteria: Governance criteria involve the structures and processes for decision-making, accountability, and transparency within a company. This includes board diversity, executive compensation, shareholder rights, and ethical business practices. Good governance ensures that companies operate with integrity and are accountable to their stakeholders, including investors, employees, customers, and the broader community.
Importance of ESG in the Fashion Industry
 
The fashion industry, known for its rapid production cycles and vast global supply chains, faces significant challenges and opportunities related to ESG criteria. Incorporating ESG principles into business strategies is crucial for several reasons:
 
  1. Risk Management: ESG provides a comprehensive framework for identifying and mitigating risks. Environmental risks include climate change, resource scarcity, and regulatory changes. Social risks encompass labor disputes, supply chain disruptions, and negative publicity from poor working conditions. Governance risks involve unethical practices, corruption, and lack of transparency. By addressing these risks, fashion brands can protect their reputation, ensure compliance, and avoid potential legal and financial consequences.
  2. Consumer Demand: Modern consumers are increasingly conscious of the ethical and environmental impact of their purchases. A commitment to ESG can enhance brand loyalty and attract environmentally and socially conscious consumers. Brands that prioritize ESG are perceived as responsible and trustworthy, gaining a competitive edge in the market.
  3. Investor Interest: Investors are increasingly incorporating ESG criteria into their decision-making processes. Companies with strong ESG performance are seen as better long-term investments due to their proactive risk management and sustainable practices. This growing investor interest is driving fashion brands to enhance their ESG strategies to attract capital and improve their market standing.
  4. Regulatory Compliance: Governments and regulatory bodies worldwide are implementing stricter regulations related to environmental protection, labor rights, and corporate governance. Adhering to ESG criteria helps fashion companies comply with these regulations, avoid penalties, and maintain their license to operate in various markets.
 
Integrating ESG into Fashion Industry Practices
 
Leading fashion brands are adopting various strategies to integrate ESG principles into their operations, demonstrating their commitment to sustainability and ethical practices.
 
  1. Sustainable Sourcing and Materials: Brands are increasingly sourcing sustainable materials to reduce their environmental impact. For instance, Stella McCartney is renowned for using eco-friendly materials such as organic cotton, recycled polyester, and vegetarian leather. By prioritizing sustainable sourcing, companies can minimize their carbon footprint, conserve natural resources, and promote biodiversity.
  2. Energy Efficiency and Carbon Reduction: Fashion companies are implementing energy-efficient practices and renewable energy sources to reduce their carbon emissions. For example, Levi Strauss & Co. has set ambitious targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions across its supply chain. Additionally, many brands are adopting innovative technologies to improve energy efficiency in manufacturing processes and retail operations.
  3. Fair Labor Practices: Ensuring fair wages, safe working conditions, and respect for workers' rights is a critical aspect of the social criteria in ESG. Patagonia, for instance, has long been an advocate for fair labor practices, regularly auditing its supply chain to ensure compliance with ethical standards. Brands are also collaborating with organizations like the Fair Labor Association and the Ethical Trading Initiative to promote labor rights and improve working conditions.
  4. Diversity and Inclusion: Promoting diversity and inclusion within the workforce and across the supply chain is essential for social sustainability. Brands like Nike and Adidas have launched initiatives to increase diversity in their leadership teams and foster an inclusive workplace culture. These efforts not only enhance brand reputation but also drive innovation and creativity within the company.
  5. Transparency and Reporting: Transparent reporting on ESG performance is crucial for accountability and building trust with stakeholders. Many fashion brands are publishing annual sustainability reports that outline their ESG goals, achievements, and challenges. For example, H&M Group's sustainability report details its progress in areas such as circular economy, climate action, and fair jobs. Transparent reporting enables stakeholders to assess a company's ESG performance and hold it accountable for its commitments.
 
Despite the progress made, integrating ESG principles into the fashion industry poses several challenges. The complexity and opacity of global supply chains make it difficult to ensure compliance with ESG standards. Additionally, there is a need for standardized metrics and frameworks to measure and compare ESG performance across companies.
 
To overcome these challenges, collaboration is key. Fashion brands, suppliers, regulators, and non-governmental organizations must work together to create robust ESG standards and ensure their effective implementation. Advancements in technology, such as blockchain, can enhance supply chain transparency and traceability, enabling more accurate ESG reporting.
 
Moreover, continuous innovation and investment in sustainable practices are essential. The fashion industry must embrace new materials, technologies, and business models that align with ESG principles. This includes exploring circular economy initiatives, such as recycling programs and product take-back schemes, to minimize waste and promote resource efficiency.
 
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria are becoming increasingly integral to the fashion industry. By adopting a holistic approach to sustainability, fashion brands can manage risks, meet consumer and investor expectations, comply with regulations, and contribute to a more sustainable and ethical industry. The journey towards full ESG integration is challenging, but the potential benefits for the environment, society, and business are immense. As the fashion industry continues to evolve, prioritizing ESG will be crucial for long-term success and resilience.
 

The fashion industry, known for its dynamic trends and global influence, has a significant environmental impact. Among the most pressing issues is the industry's substantial carbon footprint. Reducing carbon emissions is crucial for mitigating climate change and preserving the environment. As awareness of the environmental impact of fashion grows, brands are increasingly taking steps to measure, disclose, and reduce their carbon emissions across their supply chains. This article explores the various strategies that fashion brands are adopting to reduce their carbon footprint, including implementing energy-efficient practices, adopting renewable energy sources, and engaging in carbon offsetting initiatives.
 
Measuring and Disclosing Carbon Emissions
 
The first step in reducing carbon emissions is understanding the full extent of a brand's carbon footprint. This involves measuring and disclosing emissions across the entire supply chain, from raw material extraction to manufacturing, distribution, and even product use and disposal.
 
  1. Supply Chain Transparency: Supply chain transparency is crucial for accurate carbon measurement. Brands need to trace the origin of their materials and assess the carbon footprint at each stage of production. For example, Levi Strauss & Co. uses lifecycle assessments (LCA) to measure the environmental impact of their products, providing insights into where emissions are highest and where reductions can be made.
  2. Carbon Reporting: Transparent reporting of carbon emissions is becoming a standard practice among leading fashion brands. Many companies publish annual sustainability reports detailing their carbon footprint and progress towards reduction goals. For instance, H&M Group’s sustainability report includes detailed metrics on greenhouse gas emissions, highlighting both achievements and areas needing improvement.
 
Implementing Energy-Efficient Practices
 
Energy efficiency in manufacturing and distribution is a critical component of reducing carbon emissions. By optimizing energy use, fashion brands can significantly lower their carbon footprint.
 
  1. Energy-Efficient Manufacturing: Modernizing manufacturing processes to enhance energy efficiency is a primary focus for many brands. Techniques such as using energy-efficient machinery, optimizing production schedules, and implementing heat recovery systems can substantially reduce energy consumption. For example, Nike has invested in advanced knitting technology that reduces material waste and energy use in shoe production.
  2. Optimizing Distribution: The logistics involved in transporting raw materials and finished products contribute significantly to a brand's carbon footprint. Companies are adopting strategies such as consolidating shipments, optimizing transportation routes, and using fuel-efficient vehicles. Patagonia, for instance, employs a logistics strategy that minimizes air freight, favoring sea and land transport to reduce emissions.
  3. Sustainable Packaging: Reducing the carbon footprint of packaging is another important aspect. Brands are moving towards using recycled and biodegradable materials for packaging. Additionally, minimizing packaging size and weight can reduce transportation emissions. Stella McCartney has committed to using 100% recycled content for all its packaging materials.
 
Adopting Renewable Energy Sources
 
Transitioning to renewable energy sources is a powerful way to reduce carbon emissions. By powering operations with renewable energy, fashion brands can significantly cut their reliance on fossil fuels.
 
  1. On-Site Renewable Energy: Many fashion brands are investing in on-site renewable energy installations, such as solar panels and wind turbines, to power their facilities. This not only reduces carbon emissions but also provides energy security and potential cost savings. Gucci, part of the Kering Group, has installed solar panels at several of its production sites, contributing to its goal of achieving carbon neutrality.
  2. Renewable Energy Procurement: In addition to on-site installations, brands are procuring renewable energy from external providers. This can be achieved through power purchase agreements (PPAs) or by purchasing renewable energy certificates (RECs). Adidas has committed to using 100% renewable energy at its own sites in North America and Europe, demonstrating its commitment to reducing its carbon footprint.
  3. Green Building Certifications: Constructing and retrofitting facilities to meet green building standards, such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), can further enhance energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions. These certifications ensure that buildings are designed and operated to minimize environmental impact, including energy use.
 
Carbon Offsetting Initiatives
 
While reducing emissions is the primary goal, some emissions are currently unavoidable. Carbon offsetting initiatives provide a way to compensate for these residual emissions by supporting projects that reduce or remove carbon from the atmosphere.
 
  1. Reforestation Projects: Investing in reforestation projects is a common carbon offsetting strategy. Planting trees helps absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, mitigating the impact of emissions. Brands like Allbirds and Timberland have committed to reforestation initiatives as part of their carbon offsetting efforts.
  2. Sustainable Development Projects: Supporting sustainable development projects, such as renewable energy installations in developing countries, can also offset carbon emissions. These projects often provide additional benefits, such as improving local economies and health outcomes. For example, Burberry has invested in renewable energy projects in developing countries to offset its operational emissions.
  3. Carbon Neutrality Goals: Some fashion brands are setting ambitious targets to achieve carbon neutrality. This involves reducing emissions as much as possible and offsetting the remaining emissions through verified carbon offset projects. Gucci, for example, has committed to becoming carbon neutral across its entire supply chain, demonstrating leadership in the industry.
 
Despite significant progress, the fashion industry faces several challenges in reducing its carbon footprint. The complexity of global supply chains, the diversity of materials used, and the need for scalable renewable energy solutions pose ongoing obstacles. Additionally, achieving accurate and comprehensive carbon measurements requires robust data collection and reporting systems.
 
Looking forward, continuous innovation and collaboration are essential. Advancements in materials science, such as the development of low-carbon and carbon-negative fibers, hold promise for further reducing the industry’s carbon footprint. Collaboration between brands, suppliers, governments, and non-governmental organizations is crucial to create a supportive ecosystem for sustainable practices.
 
Consumer awareness and demand for sustainable fashion are also driving change. As consumers become more conscious of the environmental impact of their purchases, brands that prioritize carbon footprint reduction can enhance their reputation and build stronger customer loyalty.
 
Reducing the carbon footprint of the fashion industry is a critical step towards mitigating climate change and preserving the environment. By measuring and disclosing emissions, implementing energy-efficient practices, adopting renewable energy sources, and engaging in carbon offsetting initiatives, fashion brands can significantly reduce their environmental impact. While challenges remain, the industry's commitment to sustainability and innovation offers hope for a more sustainable future. As the fashion industry continues to evolve, reducing carbon emissions will be essential for creating a resilient and environmentally responsible sector.
 
Learn More

BECOME A MEMBER

Join the SU.RE community and become a key player in the Indian Apparel Industry's largest initiative dedicated to driving sustainability in the Country.

Sign Up Now

INDIAN APPAREL INDUSTRY’S LARGEST VOLUNTARY COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY

        INDIAN APPAREL INDUSTRY’S LARGEST VOLUNTARY COMMITMENT TO SUSTAINABILITY